[RASMB] Speed of Interference Optics vs. Absorbance Optics
Lake Paul
lpaul at purdue.edu
Tue Apr 12 08:56:31 PDT 2011
Folks,
I have a sample, a membrane protein with 0.01% DDM. I collected data at
45000 rpm, 4 min/scan. The sample is very heterogeneous but I am getting a
decent peak from the absorbance data (280 nm) at 7.4 S, but the interference
data gives me a peak at 6.5 S. I am trying to calculate the amount of
detergent bound so I need to align the interference data with absorbance
data. This is the first time in which I have gotten the peaks from the
interference data not lining up with absorbance data. Is this due to the
time it takes to make an absorbance scan relative to the interference scans?
And/or I just spun the sample too hard? Or is the DDM affecting the
sedimentation? See the attached powerpoint.
Yes, the slit assembly is functioning properly J
Any suggestions will be helpful!
Best,
Lake
PS I collected data during the same run with the same sample except it had
GFP attached. The interference peak shifted accordingly. The DDM peak lined
up well also.
Lake N. Paul, PhD
Biophysics Research Specialist
Discovery Park - Bindley Biosciences Center Purdue University
1203 West State Street
West Lafayette, Indiana, 47905
765.494.4960
BioAnalytical Lab Website:
http://www.purdue.edu/discoverypark/bioanalytical/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.rasmb.org/pipermail/rasmb-rasmb.org/attachments/20110412/25c71364/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Data_Rasmb.pptx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation
Size: 378955 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.rasmb.org/pipermail/rasmb-rasmb.org/attachments/20110412/25c71364/attachment.bin>
More information about the RASMB
mailing list