[RASMB] determination of phage particle concentration

[Tom Laue]

Another paper where the wavelength dependence of turbidity is discussed:
Moody, et al. Biophys J. 1996 October; 71(4): 2012–2021.

Timothy Dafforn wrote:
> Hi Glen,
> You are absolutely correct.
> Mathematical fitting of wavelength dependent scattering and then subtracting it from the data still remains an essential method in CD. Particularly as in the Far UV the scattering distortion is very bad (if only we could all use infrared!)
> We have published such a method as have others.
>
> It is also clear that it doesn't always obey the 4th power rule.
>
> This method does have the potential to produce very accurate estimates of macromolecular concentration and certainly shouldn't be discounted..
> Cheers
> Tim
>
> PS how is Jack?
> ________________________________________
> From: rasmb-bounces at rasmb.bbri.org [rasmb-bounces at rasmb.bbri.org] On Behalf Of Glen Ramsay [glen at avivbiomedical.com]
> Sent: 08 March 2010 14:08
> To: Steve Harding; rasmb at server1.bbri.org
> Subject: Re: [RASMB] determination of phage particle concentration
>
> Greetings RASMB:
>
> The scattering increases as the fourth power of the inverse wavelength.  Years ago Aviv's spectrophotometer had a function that would fit the baselines before and after an absorbance peak to subtract the scattering portion.
>
> However, I cringe at the idea of making analytical measurements of particles via absorbance.  Absorbance of a photo can happen only once. Scattering can happen more than once, sending a photon back into the detector's view.  The detectors of different instruments view different collection angles of the sample, so the amount of scattered light is going to vary depending on the instrument design.  Reflections of scattered light off the surroundings can send photons back onto the detector. In one custom instrument Aviv mounted the detector on a rail, and apertures were mounted on both the sample's exit and detector's entrance, to control the light collection angle.  And of course the size of the particle affects the amount of light scattering.
>
> Measure scattering with absorbance with both eyes and mind open, because the instrument is not being used as intended.
>
> Glen
>
>
> At 09:44 AM 3/5/2010, Steve Harding wrote:
> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>          boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CABC72.57041806"
>
> Dear Sabine
> Simple turbidity measurements (making sure you are away from absorption maxima) using a good quality spectrophotometer may suffice for the sort of information you are after - particle concentration, although stricvtly speaking it is not a hydrodynamic method..  This is is the usual method for measuring concentrations (particles per ml) of very large assemblies such as spores and I think it works for smaller assemblies that are not too dilute..
> Victor Bloomfield's group did quite a bit on the turbidity of phages in the late 70's and gave the relevant formulae (you may need the approx  mol. wt value) - if you look up Bahls and Bloomfield (and not Victor's QLS papers) that should give you a lead!
> All best
> Steve Harding
>
> http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ncmh
>
>   
>> Dear all,
>>
>> we are trying to obtain the concentration of bacteriophages in a
>> solution, concentration meaning the number of particles per ml. The
>> solution is supposed to be monodisperse and the MW is (roughly) known
>> but could be determined exactly. Is the any idea of how to do this
>> with a hydrodynamic method (staining is difficult to compare between
>> phage mutants and counting infected cells is tedious). I`ve got the
>> "feeling" that one could use the number-averaged MW, but maybe this is
>> totally wrong.
>>
>> Thank you for any hints, literature is also welcome.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Sabine
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sabine Kaltofen
>> PhD student
>>
>> Universität Potsdam
>> Department of Physical Biochemistry
>> Institute of Biochemistry and Biology
>> Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, Haus 25, Raum B/0.05
>> D-14476 Potsdam-Golm
>> Telefon: +49-(331)-977-5245
>> Email: kaltofen at uni-potsdam.de
>>
>>
>>     
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
> _______________________________________________
> RASMB mailing list
> RASMB at rasmb.bbri.org
> http://rasmb.bbri.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rasmb
>
>    Glen Ramsay, Ph.D.
>    Chief Scientist
>    Aviv Biomedical, Inc.
>    750 Vassar Avenue, Suite #2
>    Lakewood, NJ 08701
>    (732) 370-1300, Ext. 25
>    (732) 370-1303, FAX
>    glen at avivbiomedical.com
>    www.avivbiomedical.com
> <http://www.avivbiomedical.com/>   Skype: GlenAtAviv
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material, the disclosure of which is governed by applicable law. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error please contact the sender and destroy the materials contained in this message.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RASMB mailing list
> RASMB at rasmb.bbri.org
> http://rasmb.bbri.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rasmb
>
>   

-- 
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
University of New Hampshire
Durham, NH 03824-3544
Phone: 603-862-2459
FAX:   603-862-0031
E-mail: Tom.Laue at unh.edu
www.bitc.unh.edu
www.camis.unh.edu