[RASMB] RE: DC/Dt vs. sedfit

[Chin, Christopher]

Dear Patrick,

Thank you for asking. I have the same feeling as you do and that is
motivation for me to undertake and initial this project on my spare
time.

All the best,

Chris

 

 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------

Christopher Chin

Manager, Macromolecular Assembly Core

Sealy Center for Structural Biology and 
Molecular Biophysics 

Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

5134 MRB. rt1055

UTMB, Galveston, TX  cchin at utmb.edu, 

409-772-1693, efax 630-604-3416

-------------------------------------------------------------



-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick [mailto:patrickhbrown at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 8:47 AM
To: Chin, Christopher
Subject: DC/Dt vs. sedfit


Chris:
I would be interested in seeing your comparison between DC/Dt and
Sedfit.  What is your feelings on the two software packages? I used
DC/Dt while in graduate school, but got frustrated because although it
was very easy to use, it seemed that the answer that I got depended on
whether I took early, late, or middle scans.  I liked sedfit because I
could use all of my scans and not just a couple of them.  I didn't like
that I had to keep changing which files I loaded into DCDt to try to get
the correct mass range for fitting.

Thanks,
Patrick--
Patrick H. Brown, Ph.D.
Protein Biophysics Resource
Division of Bioengineering & Physical Science, ORS National Institutes
of Health Bldg. 13, Rm. 3N17 13 South Drive Bethesda, MD 20892 - 5766
Tel: (301) 435-9371
Fax: (301) 480-1242
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: compare Sedfit and DCDT 1.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 3331072 bytes
Desc: compare Sedfit and DCDT 1.doc
URL: <http://list.rasmb.org/pipermail/rasmb-rasmb.org/attachments/20060216/3cee059f/attachment-0006.doc>