[RASMB] SEDANAL question

Walter Stafford wstafford3 at walterstafford.com
Wed Mar 20 19:16:03 PDT 2019


Question: which "scaling parameters" are you referring to? and which parameter is entered as 9 mls/gram. NOTE: The mass concentration units used by SEDANAL are  L/g, not mL/g.

So if you entered "9", you should try 0.009 (units are L/g)

Walter Stafford
wstafford3 at walterstafford.com

"The things you do for yourself are gone when you are gone, but things you do for others remain as your legacy." --Kalu Ndukwe Kalu

> On Mar 20, 2019, at 19:55, John Sumida <jpsumida at uw.edu> wrote:
> 
> Dear RASMB,
>  
> In performing a multicomponent non-ideal fit using SEDANAL (ver. 693, and 705), the fitted scaling parameters consistently drift to their maximum upper limit value when N, the number points between meniscus and base, was increased from 500 to 1000 and above.  This also was true if the initial guesses varied significantly from a value of 9mls/gram.
>  
> What are some possible reasons that a fit would perform in this manner?
>  
> Thanks to all in advance for considering my question.
>  
> John Sumida
> University of Washington
> _______________________________________________
> RASMB mailing list
> RASMB at list.rasmb.org <mailto:RASMB at list.rasmb.org>
> http://list.rasmb.org/listinfo.cgi/rasmb-rasmb.org <http://list.rasmb.org/listinfo.cgi/rasmb-rasmb.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.rasmb.org/pipermail/rasmb-rasmb.org/attachments/20190320/7b591eeb/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the RASMB mailing list