[RASMB] hydrostatic pressures
John Correia
jcorreia at biochem.umsmed.edu
Tue May 7 17:02:01 PDT 2002
It might be worthwhile looking at the papers Gerson Kegeles published on
pressure effects - since the effect depends upon the Molar volume of
reaction small pressures can have large effects & I suspect 1000's of
bar may not be required, ie. do you have to redesign the cell? Plus
Keg in collaboration with Raymond Kikas from Dave Yphantis' lab built a
chamber for pressurizing cells that I think Tom Laue inherited?
Saxena et al 1976 Biophys Chem 5: 161-164
Kegeles & Johnson (1970) ABB 141: 59-62
Kegeles & Johnson (1970) ABB 141: 63-67
Kegeles (1970) ABB 141: 68-72
Kegels et al 1969 ANYAS 164: 183-191
There are also many papers by Harrington on pressure effects in myosin
& the construction of a different bomb for filling cells. There bomb
swelled and thus really was a bomb waiting to blow.
Finally, Walter Stafford has published simulations of pressure effects
for interacting systems.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. John J. "Jack" Correia
Department of Biochemistry
University of Mississippi Medical Center
2500 North State Street
Jackson, MS 39216
(601) 984-1522
fax (601) 984-1501
email address: jcorreia at biochem.umsmed.edu
homepage location: http://biochemistry.umc.edu/correia.html
dept homepage location: http://biochemistry.umc.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> JA KORNBLATT <krnbltt at vax2.concordia.ca> 05/07/02 01:19PM >>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The older archived RASMB emails can be found at:
http://rasmb-email.bbri.org/rasmb_archives
and current archives at
http://rasmb-email.bbri.org/pipermail/rasmb/
Search All the Archives at:
http://rasmb-email.bbri.org/rasmb_search.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the two kornblatts have worked with hydrostatic pressure as a
perturbant
for a long time and with the auc for only a couple of years.
many of the changes induced by hydrostatic pressures in the range of
1
bar to 4000 bar would be "easily" detected by auc analysis. this
includes
shape changes such as the open/closed transition of plasminogen,
association/dissociation reactions, and native/denatured reactions.
the question: has anyone spent any idle moments reflecting on the
question
of how much effort might be expended on building an auc cell that
would
withstand a couple of thousand atmospheres pressure?
am i wasting the few remaining neurons thinking about the prospects or
would it be worth while giving it some effort?
any help you can give would be appreciated.
best regards
jack (kornblatt)
_______________________________________________
RASMB mailing list
RASMB at rasmb-email.bbri.org
http://rasmb-email.bbri.org/mailman/listinfo/rasmb
More information about the RASMB
mailing list