[RASMB] buffer components and IF optics
Peter Schuck
pschuck at helix.nih.gov
Mon May 12 09:36:00 PDT 2003
John and Samantha,
I think your questions about the use of buffer components in conjunction
with the IF optics are related, as far as sedimentation velocity
experiments are concerned.
Regarding the use of IF optics in the presence of detergents, there is the
problem that you see the detergent sediment or float, whereas it is
frequently not visible in the absorption optics. I don't think that seeing
the detergent is necessarily a problem in IF. It can be a problem in UV
because of the limited dynamic range of absorption, but in IF, it is just a
signal from an extra component superimposed to your signal from the
sedimenting protein. I've done experiments with Triton and LDAO, and in
both cases it was possible to describe the detergent signal with a very
high degree of precision by a single component Lamm equation
solution. (The sedimentation or flotation parameters can be measured
separately.) You can take this superimposed species easily into account in
the data analysis (in SEDFIT, there are appropriate models for ls-g*(s) and
c(s)). In the end, with regard to sedimentation velocity experiments, I
think it may actually be an advantage to see what the detergent does.
Regarding high concentrations of DTT, I have no hands-on experience with
this situation in particular, but if it's not possible to precisely match
the sample and reference sectors in the buffer composition, you'll see the
sedimentation of DTT. Also, I'm not sure if the refractive index increment
of DTT could possibly change with oxidation state, and in this way create a
mismatch between the two sectors. But again, it should be no problem to
take this into account in the data analysis (assuming that you have an
excess signal from DTT in the sample sector), by treating this as an extra
sedimenting species.
I've run quite frequently into problems like that, where collaborators gave
me samples that were not properly matched to the reference buffer. Excess
NaCl, for example, can be very reproducibly modeled as an extra sedimenting
low-Mw component without noticeable degradation of the information of the
high-Mw sedimentation (the sedimentation patterns just look
different). However, a drawback is that the bottom position will have to
be optimized during the data analysis, because of the back-diffusion of the
extra small Mw species.
Peter
More information about the RASMB
mailing list