[RASMB] further question ln(c) vs r2
Walter Stafford
stafford at bbri.org
Mon Apr 15 12:35:00 PDT 2002
Dear Heather,
It looks as though you have a slight offset to the data which
is influencing the lowest concentration data. You might consider
fitting this data with NONLIN both with and without a floating offset
(it's called delta in NONLIN ) or the BeckmanCoulter equivalent (they
call it the baseline). Unless your protein has a large excluded
volume, is high charged and/or you are using a very low ionic
strength buffer; non-ideality should not be a problem.
If you do not try fitting directly ; try adjusting the off-set
manually until you get a straight line on your plot, the slope your
get gives essentially the Z-average molar mass.
Walter
>A follow up to that previous question. I have removed the data which gave
>a negative concentration. and plotted ln (c) vs r2 which I expect to be a
>straight line. However as the plot shows it is very curved. Am I doing
>something wrong or is that suggesting my system is non ideal?
>Should I only be ploting values for which ln(c) is >0.0?
>
>many thanks
>
>heather :)
>
>Heather Peto Department of Biochemistry
>hp217 at mole.bio.cam.ac.uk New Building
>Tel: (lab) +44 (0)1223 333343, 80 Tennis Court Road
>Tel: (office) +44 (0)1223 766022, Old Addenbrookes Site
>Fax: +44 (0)1223 766002, Cambridge, CB2 1GA
> UK
>
>
>
>
>Content-Type: IMAGE/JPEG; name="AUC.jpg"
>Content-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.33.0204151625550.6380816 at mole.bio.cam.ac.uk>
>Content-Description:
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="AUC.jpg"
>
>Attachment converted: WFS3HD:AUC.jpg (JPEG/ogle) (000E2AED)
--
Walter Stafford
mailto:stafford at bbri.org
617-658-7808
More information about the RASMB
mailing list