[RASMB] Thanks
Neil Errington
N.Errington at umist.ac.uk
Thu Oct 31 04:29:01 PST 2002
Thanks to Tom Laue, Les Holladay, Holger Strauss, Jack Correia and Richard
Thomas for help & suggestions (summarised below). I can get on and calculate
the necessary numbers now, though none of the neccesary books are in the
library here.
The molal volume for CH2 (not CH3) is listed as 16.1 cc/mole by Cohn and
Edsall "Proteins, amino acids and peptides" (p. 157. The molal volume for H
is 3.1 cc/mole, which could be added to the value for the CH2, taking into
account the co-volume. The apparent molal volume of a compound is always
greater than the sum of the volumes of the constituent atoms or groups
(these words are almost a direct quote from Cohn and Edsall... a great
resource)... and the added volume is an empirical term first estimated by
Traube to be 13 cc/g-mole. That said, the value for C is 9.9 cc/mole, for H
is 3.1 cc/mole, and for the CH2 group is 16.1 cc/mole, which is the sum of
the molal volumes of C and 2 Hs. Using the same approach, CH3 would have a
molal volume of 19.2 cc/mole.
If we take a slightly different approach, and look at the difference in
molal volumes for alanine (60.6 cc/mole) and glycine (43.5 cc/mole), the
estimate for the replacing the H with a CH3 group is 17.1 cc/mole. There are
differences (of about 0.8 cc/mole) in the electrostriction terms for alanine
and glycine (gly exhibiting slighly more electrostriction), which affect the
molal volumes. Even so, 17.1 cc/mole may be a better estimate for what you
want to calculate (where CH3 is replacing H).
So, I would increase the molal volume of the methylated amino acids ~17-18
cc/mole.
Best wishes,
Tom
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi;
I'm attaching three files. Put them in the same directory, then go to that
directory and execute setup.exe. This will unbundle the files and place an
icon on your desktop. The program is ProtCalc, and handles some modified
amino acids. There is a very extensive Word documentation file that explains
just how I computed the vbar of the mod amino acids.
If you like this program, I have a CD-ROM full of biophys software I will
mail you if you e-mail me your snail mail address
best regards
Les Holladay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a very useful table of the volumes of pairs of atoms, list by atom
and by bond type (e.g. C=0, C-O, C-H, etc.). The table has been reproduced
several times (it should be on the web!), but the definitive version is in a
book by Cohn and Edsall "Proteins, amino acids and peptides" Ch. 7. One
calculates the molar volume based on the structure of the molecule you are
interested in, then divides by the molecular weight to get the approximation
of vbar. The values calculated are remarkably close if the material is not
an ion. There are corrections (reducing vbar) that can be applied for ions.
There may be a vbar calculated for a compound similar to TAMRA (I presume
this is a set of conjugated aromatic rings) and that will be a close guess
for TAMRA.
Here are some numbers you can use for making a first pass guess:
Atom/group Volume (cc/mole)
C 9.9
H 3.1
N 1.5
O- 0.4 (2.3 if the second oxygen, as in a carboxyl)
O= 5.5
NH2 7.7
CH2 16.1
COOH 18.9
CONH (amide)20.0
For ionization
COOH<-> COO- -10.3 (i.e. decrease the molar volume by 10.3 cc/mole
for
each ionized groups)
NH3 <-> NH4+ -27.0
H2O <-> H+ + OH- -21.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assuming that your modifications are simply at the termini, the effect on
vbar should be pretty small even for relatively short peptides.
Alternatively, it shouldn't be too difficult to use the additivity
principle to calculate vbar for the modified constituents and to then use
these to calculate the overall peptide vbar. There are various tables of
group contributions - the one I have here is in 'Thermodynamic Data for
Biochemistry and Biotechnology' (ed Hinz).
I will admit to simply adding in an extra glycine, on occasion, as an
approximation for the N-Acetyl, C-Amide case, but don't tell anyone.
--
Dr. Neil Errington
Biomolecular Sciences Department
UMIST,
PO Box 88,
Manchester,
M60 1QD, UK
More information about the RASMB
mailing list